Skip to content

Conversation

llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

@llogiq llogiq commented Jul 17, 2019

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 17, 2019
@Alexendoo
Copy link
Member

Ping from triage, any updates? @eddyb

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 2, 2019

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #63207) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the tiny-list-refactor branch from 6704bab to 599cf2e Compare August 5, 2019 09:34
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Aug 5, 2019

Rebased.

Copy link
Member

@eddyb eddyb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me with benches fixed

@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the tiny-list-refactor branch from 599cf2e to 8661a9c Compare August 12, 2019 20:17
@llogiq llogiq force-pushed the tiny-list-refactor branch from 8661a9c to 45f14a8 Compare August 13, 2019 20:03
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Aug 16, 2019

@eddyb r?

@eddyb eddyb added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 18, 2019
@JohnCSimon
Copy link
Member

Ping from triage
@llogiq @eddyb I'm not sure why this is in s-waiting-on-author instead of s-waiting-on-review
what is the state of this PR?
thank you!

@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor Author

llogiq commented Aug 24, 2019

I made the changes to the benchmarks as requested. @eddyb please clarify what is missing.

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Aug 24, 2019

@llogiq Oops, you didn't mark the comments as resolved and GitHub didn't say "outdated" because you just added a line afterwards... So I thought you hadn't done those changes yet, my bad.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 24, 2019

📌 Commit 45f14a8 has been approved by eddyb

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 24, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2019
Refactor `TinyList::contains` and `len` to iterate instead of recurse

None
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2019
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #62744 (Refactor `TinyList::contains` and `len` to iterate instead of recurse)
 - #63813 (Do not suggest `.try_into()` on `i32::from(x)`)
 - #63833 (Suggest calling closure with resolved return type when appropriate)
 - #63839 (Ensure miri can do bit ops on pointer values)
 - #63854 (Modifies how Arg, Arm, Field, FieldPattern and Variant are visited)
 - #63859 (Don't unwrap the result of `span_to_snippet`)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 45f14a8 into rust-lang:master Aug 25, 2019
@llogiq llogiq deleted the tiny-list-refactor branch August 25, 2019 06:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants